Connect YOUR context with PROVEN standards.
Pick helpful tools to USE next Monday.
3 sessions · 3 hours each · onsite at IMC
Anh Vu · devops4pm
Welcome / About Trainer2 / 27 · Section 01
About Trainer
Anh Vu · PMP Trainer · Senior PM
· devops4pm
10 years of project management experience.
Digital transformation projects in finance & banking for UK, US, Singapore companies.
My purpose: help YOU equip standard knowledge & practical tools to solve real project management
problems.
How we work
Start from the foundation. Connect to YOUR context.
Try tools & methods you can USE next Monday.
Welcome / About PMI3 / 27 · Section 01
About PMI
PMI (Project Management Institute) is the
global professional body for project
management: it publishes the PMBOK® Guide (now 8th Edition) and administers the
PMP® credential.
More than 1.6 million people hold the PMP worldwide, across 200+ countries — a shared
language used the world over.
In Vietnam, it is still growing — an estimated ~6,000 PMP holders.
We use this global standard as a map and common language, not as exam prep — so every
function can describe the same things the same way.
How we use it
A map and common language — not exam prep. Anyone can go deeper at the source after the course.
Why it matter?
1 AI-for-PMs roadmap Takeaway: Biggest shift in PM work!!
Session 1 / Foundation7 / 27 · Section 01
Session 1 — Foundation
01WHY organizations need projects?
02WHAT a project is?
03HOW IMC governs projects?
04See the big picture. IMC Project Portfolio Dashboard.
Connection
Projects are NOT running in isolation. They are part of the bigger system.
Connect YOUR project with IMC Org structure & strategy.
Session 1 / WHY projects?8 / 27 · Section 01
WHY projects?
Organizations need a vehicle to turn ideas into realities.
Nokia
Would still be a wood mill in Finland — without projects to build the mobile division.
McDonald's
Would still be a single restaurant in California — without projects to scale the franchise model.
Starbucks
Would still be a small coffee store in Seattle — without projects to expand globally.
Connection Activity
Every systematic changes: new product, global expansion, digital transformation... or small initiatives: solve
1 problem, win 1 customer... starts as a project.
YOUR project: Write down the purpose/ goal. Why does it exist?
Session 1 / WHY projects? / From today to a better state9 / 27 · Section 01
How organizations change reality
A project is the vehicle from today's state to a higher-value future state.
Session 1 / WHAT is a project?10 / 27 · Section 01
WHAT is a project?
A temporary
endeavor undertaken to create a unique outcome.
Characteristic
What it means in practice
Temporary
Defined start and defined end. A project that never closes has become an operation — or a symptom.
Unique
No two projects are identical. Copying last year's approach without adapting it is a leading cause
of failure.
Outcome
The goal is a result the organization can use — not the activity itself.
Each started as a project
Session 1 / WHAT is a project? / Project vs. operations11 / 27 · Section 01
Project vs. operations
Both are work. Both consume resources. The
difference is in the shape of the work — and what management it needs.
Project
Operations
Goal
Deliver a unique outcome
Sustain a steady output
Lifespan
Has a beginning and an end
Continuous
Team
Cross-functional, temporary
Usually within one function
Success
Outcome delivered, project closes
Stable outputs
At IMC
OEM project, factory build, market entry
QA testing, production runs, monthly close
Why this matters
Projects fail when managed like operations. The work needs explicit scope, named cross-functional owners, risk
anticipation, and a clear close — not just operational rhythms.
Session 1 / WHAT is a project? / The bigger picture12 / 27 · Section 01
Session 1 / WHAT is a project? / System for Delivery13 / 27 · Section 01
System for Delivery
Project is part of the bigger system
Session 1 / WHAT is a project? / Org structures — Functional14 / 27 · Section 01
Org structure — Functional
The big picture also includes how the organization is
wired — because structure decides how much authority a project leader really has.
PM authority: little or none
People stay under their functional manager. Projects compete for part-time people, and handoffs between
departments are where days get lost.
Session 1 / WHAT is a project? / Org structures — Projectized15 / 27 · Section 01
Org structure — Project-oriented
The organization is built around projects. People
report to a project manager who owns the budget and the team.
PM authority: high to almost total
Fast decisions and strong focus — but people can sit idle (and expensive) between projects, and need a "home"
when the project ends.
Session 1 / WHAT is a project? / Org structures — Strong Matrix16 / 27 · Section 01
Org structure — Strong Matrix
A dedicated Manager of Project Managers sits alongside
the functional managers. PMs pull specialists across functions for the life of a project.
PM authority: moderate to high
The PM is a real, full-time role and specialists are shared efficiently — but people answer to two bosses, so
it only works with clear governance and priority-setting.
Session 1 / WHAT is a project? / Org structures — Compare17 / 27 · Section 01
Group discussion — compare the structures
In your table, fill the boxes — advantages and disadvantages of
each structure. Then: which one is IMC, really?
Project-oriented
Functional
Strong Matrix
Advantages
Disadvantages
Session 1 / WHAT is a project? / What the survey told us18 / 27 · Section 01
What the survey told us
Common challenges when delivering projects.
01Scope creep — requirements shift mid-project without a
formal change process.
02Insufficient resources — same people spread across too
many projects at once.
03Cross-dept coordination gaps — handoffs between
functions lose days, sometimes weeks.
04Unclear decision ownership — no single named owner when
conflict or ambiguity arises.
05Info silos — project status is invisible to leadership
and adjacent teams.
They're universal challenges
Every matrix organization faces similar challenges. IMC is not an exception.
Group Discussion: Pick the most painful one. What're you doing with it? Any wish/ suggestion to solve
it?
Governance answers: who decides what,
when & how do we know things are on track?
InitiateAuthorize & name an owner
→
PlanScope, plan, risks
→
ExecuteDeliver & track status
→
CloseHand off & capture lessons
Governance element
At IMC today
Project authorization
How is a project formally approved to start?
Roles & accountability
Who owns delivery? Who sponsors it? Who is consulted?
Communication model
How does leadership see status across all projects?
Workflow / approach
How & when things will be planned, delivered, verified, changed.
Closure & lessons
How does IMC formally close a project and capture what it learned?
From the survey: IMC participants flagged unclear ownership and lack of status
visibility as top pain points.
Both are governance problems — not execution problems.
No project runs alone. Senior leadership
reads them together — as bets on IMC's strategy. One view connects every project to the bigger
picture and the strategic changes it drives.
Project
Strategic bet
Status
Next milestone
Decision needed
Customer OEM/ODM line
Grow OEM revenue
● On track
Pilot batch · Jun
—
New own-brand product
Own-brand portfolio
● At risk
Formula sign-off
Approve marketing budget
New production line
Capacity & capability
● On track
Equipment install
—
Market entry — new region
New markets
● Blocked
Product registration
Choose local partner
How PMs talk to senior leadership
· Lead with the headline — status + the one decision you need, not an activity log.
· Speak in outcomes & value ("we'll hit the Jun launch"), tied to the strategic bet.
· Report by exception — flag red/amber and the ask; don't narrate what's green.
· Surface bad news early: an early red is governance, a late red is failure.
In your department
group, list the projects your department is involved in. Capture each project's highlights on the
dashboard — status, owner, next milestone, the decision you need.
By department5–6 members per group
15 minList your projects · capture highlights on the dashboard
Share-backBuild the holistic view — together
One servant leader per group
Not the manager — a peer who draws out every voice, keeps the list moving, and speaks for the group
at share-back.
Watch for — the holistic view
When the groups combine their dashboards, does the same project show up differently across
departments? That gap is the portfolio problem — and why no one department sees the whole board.
Session 1 / Wrap27 / 27 · Section 01
Wrap & what comes next
You now have a shared language for projects
at IMC. Session 2 gives you the toolkit to run them.
Next Monday
Take the dashboard you built today. Reflect it with your TEAM about all running projects.
Do you have a bigger picture of how the whole system is moving?